ON THE THING ABOUT HAVING TWO PRIME MINISTERS...
... I can't say better than Skipper, with his "Two Prime Ministers' furore is a row Without Substance" post.
Really, the media just needs to shut its moaning about this. They're only trying to cause trouble because the smooth and orderly transition of power that's happening does not a good headline make.
And the Tories and Lib Dems can shut their gobs as well. No one wants a general election right now, least of all the electorate. Most of them couldn't be bothered to vote in the recent council elections.
Gordon has written to me anyway, something to do with how I think he should run the country, but I've not had time to read it properly yet.
Update:
Ohhh, now he's e-mailed me. He feels very humble, apparently.
3 comments:
Wow. First your own party, now the media. You guys really don't like anyone having a voice, do you?
Well, the way that it generally works is that people can say things and other people can tell them they are wrong, or to shut up, or whatever.
I don't think we have a rule in this country that people can say whatever they like and everyone else must nod quietly in agreement.
How does it work in Reston?
Two PMs may be not a bad idea, seeing our own half-wit. May they prosper and multiply. Science fiction stories about collective minds creating a single genius come to mind.
There really could be something in it, however the techniques of plugging them all together are not here yet. Pity.
Post a Comment